This post is a note on epigraphs, infimal convolution, Minkowski sum & convex conjugate of piecewise linear convex functions in . I want to provide proofs for relations between these operations and counterexamples for wrong guesses.
Notions:
- infimal convolution: ,
- Minkowski sum: ,
- convex conjugate: ,
- epigraph: .
some notes:
- https://angms.science/doc/CVX/Epigraph.pdf
- https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1597809/inf-convolution-two-basic-questions
1 piecewise linear function
A intuitive but very complex definition is the following[1],
Let be a set of bounded convex polytopes in . A piecewise linear function can be defined as
where is a vector associated with polytope .
For continuity, we require
For convexity, we further require that
- for any subset , is convex;(for polytopes)
- the restriction of to any two polytopes from P that share a facet is convex.[2] (for . In fact, 1 is already included in 2.)
(Later I find a much simpler definition in [3] example 3.5.)
It is shown in exercise 3.29 that every piecewise linear convex function can be expressed in this form.
We have for any . can locate in the same as since we can arbitrarily choose . Thus . Note that is linear in each . Thus . Thus .
Now given these definitions we are particularly interested in the minimum number of polytopes which define the piecewise liner convex function in high dimension.
2 properties
pwl = piecewise linear. Let be the number of hyperplanes in the definition of .
2.1 convex conjugate
Let be the convex conjugate of a pwl convex function . is also pwl convex if restricted to .
Consider the convex conjugate from a geometric view. The epigraph of our pwl convex function is some convex polytope in . The convex conjugate is . is a hyperplane with normal vector and passing through the origin. Now is the amount of space hyperplane has to shift along the dimension to make itself a supporting hyperplane of . Note that the tangent points are exactly vertices of .
It is safe to write since we only consider the extended domain. Thus we have . Let be the number of vertices on . One can see that is the maximum of affine functions.
I believe there will be only hyperplanes on instead of … However, we know that in general is the maximum of at least functions since every vertex corresponds to a hyperplane in .
2.2 pwl convex function in a linear mapping
Let be a pwl convex function. Does there always exist a pwl convex and a linear mapping such that .
As you expected, the answer is no. Let be the maximum of a set of 2D planes. Consider a series of points on the 2D plane. After applying the linear mapping to , we will get a sequence of numbers(points in 1D) . We assume that is non-decreasing. Note that the value of on is always unimodal since is convex. However, the value of on may not be unimodal. Thus the composition of a linear mapping and a pwl convex function in 1D is not equivalent to pwl convex functions in high dimensions.
3 sum of pwl convex functions
I want to show that in general the number of hyperplanes in the sum of pwl convex functions can be large.
It is known that for two pwl convex functions , . It is also known that (with some requirements on and ). There is a theorem in [4] section 4.3 which shows that the number of faces of the Minkowski sum of two polytopes can be huge. The bound can be reached by sums of cyclic polytopes.
We can define pwl convex functions based on cyclic polytopes and we know that the Minkowski sum will have lots of faces(of different dimensions). We also know that the number of faces in is at least where is the number of vertices(faces of 1D) in . Now if the infimal convolution of two pwl convex functions also has many faces, the number of faces in the sum of pwl convex functions will be large.
Let be two pwl convex functions in . Let be the number of hyperplanes in respectively. What is the minimum number of hyperplanes in ?